![]() |
Posted: 01/28/07
Karen's Best and Worst of
|
|
I write sometimes under the alias Feminist Film Critic, so I thought I'd indulge my passion here by listing my top films featuring women in strong, complex, and/or powerful roles. Missing here are some of my personal favorite films of 2006, including Brick and The Departed. Missing also are films that I simply havent had a chance to see yet, like The Painted Veil. But no year-end list is perfect, and no critic can see every film, hard as we try. A few more qualifiersthis is not a list that honors films for depicting women as exclusively confident and empowered. Rather, I simply wanted to consider the portrayal of women by considering the complexity, realism, and emotional impact of each film. As the Oscar race is proving, it has been a good year for women, even those of a certain age (ahem). So take this for what it is one womans opinion of what moved me, for good and ill. The Best
Volver Never a Pedro Almodivar fan, this film has completely changed my mind. The world of this film is rich and vibrantalmost intoxicating. A film about family, motherhood, loyalty, sensuality (read: not masculine-determined sexuality), and hope, Volver allows American audiences to see Penelope Cruz at her best. And her best is incredible. A Prairie Home Companion Some critics included this film in their year-end lists in honor of Robert Altmans passing, but this film earns its top position on my list for its presentation of quirky, humorous, experienced women. As sisters Yolanda and Rhonda Johnson, Meryl Streep and Lily Tomlin embody simplicity and elegance. As their daughter, Lindsay Lohan embraces the angst and yearning of a young woman trying to determine who she wants to be. Death appears as a woman here as well, and Virginia Madsen imparts a haunting sensuality to her. She is like a siren, calling the living to a gentle and peaceful goodnight. Let us hope Mr. Altman realized his own beautiful vision of death. Notes on a Scandal As promised, here is a film that doesnt present women as particularly wise or winning. Though I enjoyed how director Richard Eyre embraced the radiant beauty of Cate Blanchett, I also relished Blanchetts confusion and weakness as Sheba Hart. With a life overloaded by complications, including an older husband and a mentally-challenged child, Blanchetts failed artist reaches out for passion, finding it in the worst possible place. Yet the audience joins her in this journey, feeling a bit icky but somehow empathizing with her yearning for something more. Dame Judi Denchs Barbara Covet (the last name is not an accident) manipulates and plots her way into Shebas life. In truth, she is a rather vicious woman. But her devastating loneliness and complete inability to accept her own desire embodies her with a moving tragedy. These women are not icons or heroes. They are weak, selfish, and at times reprehensible. But they are real. And when Blanchett and Dench finally tear into each other, they explode with rage and despair. It is awesome. Little Children
In the end, this film is a disappointing endorsement of the status quo. But somewhere before the credits run, heroine Sarah Pierce (Kate Winslet) voices the silent cry of many a suburban wife: Is this all I will be and feel? Sarah admires Madame Bovary for her fearless quest to find something more, and her refusal to internalize societys condemnation of her adulterous actions defies sexual and social boundaries. In her act of transgression, Sarah claims control of her body and her mind. Of course, adultery isnt really a very good or noble thing. If Sarah is unhappy with her husband, perhaps she should leave him, as Madame Bovary was able to do only through suicide. But director Todd Field only flirts with the complexities of her indiscretion, choosing instead to offer a reading of the adultery as a sort of yearning for youth and freedom. Nevertheless, as Sarah notes, it is the dream of something more that makes Madame Bovary something special. So, too, with Sarah. There is another, less obvious example of terrifically complex femininity in Little Children. As the mother of a sex offender, Phyllis Somerville provides her character May McGorvey with a tragic nobility. She yearns in vain for her child to find normal domestic happiness. In her every action, be it scrubbing the offensive language written on her sidewalk or her tender creation of a singles ad for her son, McGorvey demonstrates that a mothers love recognizes no obstacle or limitation. Little Children may not satisfy my personal interest in defying societys parameters, but how marvelous is its willingness to at least voice the question. The Devil Wears Prada Thank God for Meryl Streep. Her Miranda Priestly is a bitch, to be sure. A strong and powerful woman who expects others to pander to her every need. A woman who does her job well and demands respect. A woman who hides her own unhappiness behind a façade of coolness and perfectionism. Streep transforms a villain into the most human character in the film. May we all be such marvelous bitches. Now, this is a film about fashion that allows its main character Andy Sachs (Anne Hathaway) to show up completely unprepared for a job interview and then marks the pinnacle of her achievement by her smaller dress size. So this is less of a nod to the film than simply an ode to the complexity that Street brings to every role she plays. Scoop and Sherrybaby Woody Allens Scoop is an endearing romp with little substance, but Scarlett Johanssons Sondra Pransky is a cooky delight. She sleeps with men almost as a matter of course, seemingly freed from the legacy of American-brand Puritan repression. How marvelous to see a character so completely take charge of her own desire. She does not use sex to control menindeed her first appearance in the film demonstrates her failure to manipulate men with her body. Sondra enjoys men and enjoys sex. And Allen doesnt punish her for it. Laurie Collyers Sherrybaby presents the complete opposite: a woman accustomed to using her body as currency. Maggie Gyllenhaals Sherry Swanson is just out of prison, desperate to reconnect with her daughter. But first she must navigate the bureaucracy of parole and the distrust of her family. Despite her repeated failures, Sherry picks herself back up and keeps living. Again, this is a deeply flawed female character, but she is heroic in her effort. Dreamgirls and Phat Girlz Both films model female friendship through the good times and the bad. Somewhat naively executed, perhaps, but nevertheless uplifting, the movies ultimately affirm that women support each other despite betrayal, jealousy, and misunderstanding. Nnegest Likkés Phat Girlz lacks sophistication, but it relates the story of its overweight heroines dream of success with tremendous heart. She draws into sharp focus the myriad ways society punishes heavy women, and through a typical fairy-tale narrative, she encourages all women to take pride in themselves and their bodies. Similarly, Dreamgirls demonstrates how culture marginalizes larger women. Like Phat Girlz, Bill Condons musical attempts more resonance than its fairy-tale narrative can achieve. But in its message that beauty often trumps talent, we learn a valuable lesson about our own complicity in creating the modern obsession with being thin. The Break-Up Peyton Reeds daringly honest rendering of a couples bitter and messy break-up delivers a rather inspiring illustration of female need. As Brooke Meyers, Jennifer Aniston issues a sincere performance as a woman who desperately wants to reunite with her ex-boyfriend but does not know how to achieve this feat without returning to their past cycle of bickering and disappointment. I should also note that Vince Vaughns Gary Grobowski is clueless and stubborn and therefore completely human. Some movies elevate their female characters by disparaging their male onesa decidedly unfeminist and unhelpful division of the sexes. But with The Break-Up, both of our characters are a bit of a mess in a completely believable and painful ways. Many people did not like this film for its verisimilitude, preferring the fairy tale. Ill take realistic pain over unachievable fantasy any day. Of course, Im still bitter that Prince Charming is married to both Cinderella and Snow White, yet somehow we arent supposed to notice. The Worst
X-Men: The Last Stand
How to destroy a trilogy? Let me count the ways no wait, all I have to do is talk about Brett Ratners complete inability to represent female rage on screen. In the third installment of this series, Famke Janssen returns as Phoenix, a completely unstable and furious force of nature. So what do we see? Not her murder of alter-ego Jean Greys husband, which Ratner cowardly depicts off-screen. Not her attempt to wield power over Magneto, to whom she yields repeatedly. Not a battle to the death with Wolverine, whom she hates and loves all at once. Why not unleash her devastating power and see what happens? Why not give Phoenix a plan, a purpose, a goal? Ratner could have used this character to explore female power, jealousy, fear, anger, pain, and even weakness. But instead he puts her in a corner and then employs her abilities to create a rather unfocused and half-hearted attempt to bury a few good guys. Ho-hum. The other women dont fair much better. Storm enforces her leadership with a few weak speeches. And Rogue? Dont even get me started on his castration of Rogue Okay, clearly, Im still upset about Ratners complete mishandling of this trilogy. Previously a complex and moving examination of outsiders finding a purpose beyond themselves, Ratner took the low road and easy turns, and he seriously underestimated the dramatic potential of his female characters. V for Vendetta This was a bad film on so many levels, I would need more than a few words to describe my continued disappointment in the Wachowski brothers. But let me just say that Natalie Portmans Evey is tortured, mentally and physically, by her masked hero. And then she falls in love with this completely disturbed and psychotic maniac. Wow. Thanks, for that inspiring representation of womankind, Andy and Larry. The Last Kiss For realizing every horrible stereotype about women as cloying, needy, naggy, and doormat-y. Guess that last one isnt really a word. Despite Jacinda Barretts luminous turn as Zach Braffs pregnant girlfriend, this film directed by Tony Goldwyn endorses a view of women as manipulators who lure men into sex and then castrate them through enforced domestication. Worse, its does this through a clichéd script that lacks psychological depth and insight. Gender relations are complicated, and they deserve more than this. Thank you for Smoking
I love this wickedly sharp satire of the life of a lobbyist. What I dont love is its portrayal of villain Heather Holloway (Katie Holmes). In a film full of morally flexible characters, Holloway should fit right in as a reporter who uses sex to get the story. Everyone in this film makes a habit of fucking people to get what they want. But in the final moments of the film, the humiliated Nick Naylor (Aaron Eckhart) exacts his revenge by exposing Holloways sexual tactics. She stands in her newsroom, horrified that he has aired her dirty laundry. The problem lies in the fact that the movie thus endorses a continued valuation of a woman based on sexual purity. He loses nothing for revealing his sexual relationship with the reporter, even though his weakness allowed her to expose him. She, however, is rendered a whore by his simple statement of fact that they had copulated. Havent we gotten past this sort of archaic sexual disparity? Karen Petruska is a film critic living in Chicago. Got a problem? Email us at filmmonthly@hotmail.com
|